1. Macroscopic/Organoleptic: The unaided senses of sight, smell or taste.
Included here, however, would be use of a hand lens with 4-20x magnification for visual identification. These methods are typically used for an herb or botanical ingredient in whole or uncut form.
a. Analysis is based on attributes such as:
(1) Defined morphological and/or anatomical characteristics of the whole plant or individual plant parts (e.g., leaf, flower, fruit, seed, root and rhizome, bark) and
(2) Characteristic color, fracture, smell, or taste.
b. Identification is achieved by positive comparison of morphological characteristics with authenticated or in-house plant reference material or an authoritative technical reference description or test that can assure the identity of the botanical ingredient.
c. Herbs and plant parts that have been cut or ground to the point where morphological characteristics are no longer observable to the unaided eye are best analyzed by microscopic and/or chemical means.
d. Observations:
(1) It is possible that processing variables may promote some difference in taste or colors of herbal raw materials, thus confounding proper and positive identification by macroscopic or organoleptic techniques.
(2) It is possible that reliance on taxonomic or botanical characters including macroscopic, anatomical, and organoleptic characteristics alone may not confirm identity and may not detect adulterants unless the tests are sufficiently precise to distinguish the species from those that it can be confused with in the area that the botanical was collected.
(3) The harvest of plants for use as dietary ingredients often does not coincide with the plant's flowering season. All of the distinguishing morphological characteristics of the plant are not present at such times. While this is not always a significant obstacle to identification, a manufacturer should use good judgment in determining whether this technique can effectively identify plant material at such times without an identity test that has been proven to distinguish the desired species from know and potential adulterants where the botanical is collected.
(4) In the case of plants harvested from wild populations, it is possible that material from different locations and different collectors may be mixed prior to identification by the representative specimen. The integrity of such methodology is suspect in such situations unless the training of collectors and shipping of the material is sufficient to assure the proper identity of all the material and that sampling protocols are designed to detect the adulteration of heterogeneous lots of material. |