 |
 |
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
were provided to the plant identification working
group and the development of the practice proceeded from there. Not all of the themes
identified in the literature were necessarily strictly within the confines of our activities
(which were determined to be restricted to the raw material harvesting/collecting stage).
However, to meet the recommendations contained in the various documents required
establishing proper practices at the production stage of the chain. For example, a
common theme running through many of the recommendations is to assign a number to
each lot to ensure traceability of the material through the chain. In our practice, an
identification number is assigned to each lot at the retention sample and certificate of
authenticity stage. In general, the practice developed in this project meets or exceeds
any of the recommendations found in the existing protocols for plant identification
located to date.
for the working group was that the process should enable
widespread participation by those involved in the industry now, as well as those who
may enter the industry in the future. Because of this, the group recognized that many
producers without a formal education still have extensive knowledge of the plant
materials they work with (in some cases, beyond the capabilities of more formally trained-
experts). Therefore, the group recognized that the identification process can be pursued-
by anyone with the experience, education, or training to reliably identify plant materials. |
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|